This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions.
\n
Nuvaxovid dispersion for injection
\nCOVID-19 Vaccine (recombinant, adjuvanted)
\n\n
\n
These are multidose vials which contain 5 doses or 10 doses of 0.5 mL per vial (see section 6.5).
\n\n
One dose (0.5 mL) contains 5 micrograms of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein* and is adjuvanted with Matrix-M.
\n\n
Adjuvant Matrix-M containing per 0.5 mL dose: Fraction-A (42.5 micrograms) and Fraction-C (7.5 micrograms) of Quillaja saponaria Molina extract.
\n\n
*produced by recombinant DNA technology using a baculovirus expression system in an insect cell line that is derived from Sf9 cells of the Spodoptera frugiperda species.
\n\n
For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.
\n
\n
Dispersion for injection (injection).
\n\n
The dispersion is colourless to slightly yellow, clear to mildly opalescent (pH 7.2)
\n
\n
Nuvaxovid is indicated for active immunisation to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 12 years of age and older.
\n\n
The use of this vaccine should be in accordance with official recommendations.
\n
Primary vaccination series
\nIndividuals 12 years of age and older
\nNuvaxovid is administered intramuscularly as a course of 2 doses of 0.5 mL each. It is recommended to administer the second dose 3 weeks after the first dose (see section 5.1).
\n\n
Interchangeability
\nThere are no data available on the interchangeability of Nuvaxovid with other COVID-19 vaccines to complete the primary vaccination course. Individuals who have received a first dose of Nuvaxovid should receive the second dose of Nuvaxovid to complete the vaccination course.
\nBooster dose
\nBooster dose in individuals 12 years of age and older
\nA booster dose of Nuvaxovid (0.5 mL) may be administered intramuscularly approximately 3 months after the primary series of Nuvaxovid in individuals 12 years of age and older (homologous booster dose).
\nNuvaxovid may also be given as a booster dose in individuals 18 years of age and older following a primary series comprised of an mRNA vaccine or adenoviral vector vaccine (heterologous booster dose). The dosing interval for the heterologous booster dose is the same as that authorised for a booster dose of the vaccine used for primary vaccination (see section 5.1).
\n\n
Paediatric population
\nThe safety and efficacy of Nuvaxovid in children aged less than 12 years have not yet been established. No data are available.
\n\n
Elderly population
\nNo dose adjustment is required in elderly individuals ≥ 65 years of age.
\n
\n
Nuvaxovid is for intramuscular injection only, preferably into the deltoid muscle of the upper arm.
\n\n
Do not inject the vaccine intravascularly, subcutaneously, or intradermally.
\n\n
The vaccine should not be mixed in the same syringe with any other vaccines or medicinal products.
\n\n
For precautions to be taken before administering the vaccine, see section 4.4.
\n\n
For instructions on handling and disposal of the vaccine, see section 6.6.
\n
\n
Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.
\n\n
\n
Traceability
\n\n
In order to improve the traceability of biological medicinal products, the name and the batch number of the administered product should be clearly recorded.
\n\n
General recommendations
\n\n
Hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis
\n\n
Events of anaphylaxis have been reported with Nuvaxovid. Appropriate medical treatment and supervision should always be readily available in case of an anaphylactic reaction following the administration of the vaccine.
\n\n
Close observation for at least 15 minutes is recommended following vaccination. An additional dose of the vaccine should not be given to those who have experienced anaphylaxis to a prior dose of Nuvaxovid.
\n\n
Myocarditis and pericarditis
\n\n
There is an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with Nuvaxovid. These conditions can develop within just a few days after vaccination and have primarily occurred within 14 days. (see section 4.8).
\nAvailable data suggest that the course of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination is not different from myocarditis or pericarditis in general.
\nHealthcare professionals should be alert to the signs and symptoms of myocarditis and pericarditis. Vaccinees (including parents or caregivers) should be instructed to seek immediate medical attention if they develop symptoms indicative of myocarditis or pericarditis such as (acute and persisting) chest pain, shortness of breath, or palpitations following vaccination.
\n\n
Healthcare professionals should consult guidance and/or specialists to diagnose and treat this condition.
\n\n
Anxiety-related reactions
\n\n
Anxiety-related reactions, including vasovagal reactions (syncope), hyperventilation, or stress‐related reactions may occur in association with vaccination as a psychogenic response to the needle injection. It is important that precautions are in place to avoid injury from fainting.
\n\n
Concurrent illness
\n\n
Vaccination should be postponed in individuals suffering from an acute severe febrile illness or acute infection. The presence of a minor infection and/or low-grade fever should not delay vaccination.
\n\n
Thrombocytopenia and coagulation disorders
\n\n
As with other intramuscular injections, the vaccine should be given with caution in individuals receiving anticoagulant therapy or those with thrombocytopenia or any coagulation disorder (such as haemophilia) because bleeding or bruising may occur following an intramuscular administration in these individuals.
\n\n
Immunocompromised individuals
\n\n
The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the vaccine has been assessed in a limited number of immunocompromised individuals. The efficacy of Nuvaxovid may be lower in immunosuppressed individuals.
\n\n
Duration of protection
\n\n
The duration of protection afforded by the vaccine is unknown as it is still being determined by ongoing clinical trials.
\n\n
Limitations of vaccine effectiveness
\n\n
Individuals may not be fully protected until 7 days after their second dose. As with all vaccines, vaccination with Nuvaxovid may not protect all vaccine recipients.
\n\n
Excipients
\n\n
Sodium
\nThis vaccine contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per dose, that is to say essentially ‘sodium-free’.
\n\n
Potassium
\nThis vaccine contains potassium, less than 1 mmol (39 mg) per dose, that is to say, essentially ‘potassium-free’.
\n
\n
Co-administration of Nuvaxovid with inactivated influenza vaccines has been evaluated in a limited number of participants in an exploratory clinical trial sub-study, see section 4.8 and section 5.1.
\n\n
The binding antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 was lower when Nuvaxovid was given concomitantly with inactivated influenza vaccine. The clinical significance of this is unknown.
\n\n
Concomitant administration of Nuvaxovid with other vaccines has not been studied.
\n
\n
Pregnancy
\n\n
There is limited experience with use of Nuvaxovid in pregnant women. Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy, embryo/foetal development, parturition, or post-natal development, see section 5.3.
\n\n
Administration of Nuvaxovid in pregnancy should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for the mother and foetus.
\n\n
Breast-feeding
\n\n
It is unknown whether Nuvaxovid is excreted in human milk.
\n\n
No effects on the breast-fed newborn/infant are anticipated since the systemic exposure of the breast-feeding woman to Nuvaxovid is negligible.
\n\n
Fertility
\n\n
Animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity, see section 5.3.
\n
\n
Nuvaxovid has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines. However, some of the effects mentioned under section 4.8 may temporarily affect the ability to drive or use machines.
\n
\n
Summary of the safety profile after primary series
\n\n
Participants 18 years of age and older
\nThe safety of Nuvaxovid was evaluated from an interim analysis of pooled data from 5 ongoing clinical trials conducted in Australia, South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States and Mexico. At the time of the analysis, a total of 49,950 participants aged 18 years and older received at least one dose of the two-dose primary series of Nuvaxovid (n=30,058) or placebo (n=19,892). At the time of vaccination, the median age was 48 years (range 18 to 95 years). The median duration of follow-up was 70 days post-Dose 2, with 32,993 (66%) participants completing more than 2 months follow-up post-Dose 2.
\n\n
Of the pooled reactogenicity data, which includes participants aged 18 years and older enrolled in the two phase 3 studies who received any dose of Nuvaxovid (n=20,055) or placebo (n=10,561), the most frequent adverse reactions were injection site tenderness (75%), injection site pain (62%), fatigue (53%), myalgia (51%), headache (50%), malaise (41%), arthralgia (24%), and nausea or vomiting (15%). Adverse reactions were usually mild to moderate in severity with a median duration of less than or equal to 2 days for local events and less than or equal to 1 day for systemic events following vaccination.
\n\n
Overall, there was a higher incidence of adverse reactions in younger age groups: the incidence of injection site tenderness, injection site pain, fatigue, myalgia, headache, malaise, arthralgia, and nausea or vomiting was higher in adults aged 18 to less than 65 years than in those aged 65 years and above.
\n\n
Local and systemic adverse reactions were more frequently reported after Dose 2 than after Dose 1.
\n\n
Licensed inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines were co-administered to participants on the same day as Dose 1 of Nuvaxovid (n=217) or placebo (n=214) in the opposite deltoid muscle of the arm in 431 participants enrolled in an exploratory Phase 3 (2019nCoV-302) sub-study. The frequency of local and systemic adverse reactions in the influenza sub-study population was higher than in the main study population following Dose 1 in both Nuvaxovid and placebo recipients.
\n\n
Adolescents 12 through 17 years of age
\nThe safety of Nuvaxovid in adolescents was evaluated in an interim analysis of the paediatric expansion portion of an ongoing Phase 3 multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study (Study 2019nCoV-301). Safety data were collected in 2,232 participants 12 through 17 years of age, with and without evidence of prior SARS CoV-2 infection, in United States who received at least one dose of Nuvaxovid (n=1,487) or placebo (n=745). Demographic characteristics were similar among participants who received Nuvaxovid and those who received placebo.
\n\n
The most frequent adverse reactions were injection site tenderness (71%), injection site pain (67%), headache (63%), myalgia (57%), fatigue (54%), malaise (43%), nausea or vomiting (23%), arthralgia (19%) and pyrexia (17%). Fever was observed more frequently in adolescents aged 12 through to 17 years compared to adults, with the frequency being very common after the second dose in adolescents. Adverse reactions were usually mild to moderate in severity with a median duration of less than or equal to 2 days for local events and less than or equal to 1 day for systemic events following vaccination.
\n\n
Summary of the safety profile after booster dose
\n\n
Participants 18 years of age and older
\nIn an independent study (CoV-BOOST study, EudraCT 2021-002175-19) evaluating the use of a Nuvaxovid booster dose in individuals who had completed primary vaccination with an authorised mRNA COVID-19 vaccine or adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccine, no new safety concerns were identified.
\n\n
The safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of Nuvaxovid was evaluated in an ongoing Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study (Study 2019nCoV-301). Overall, 12,777 participants received a booster dose of the vaccine at least 6 months after the two-dose primary series (median of 11 months between completion of primary series and booster dose). Of the 12,777 participants who received a booster dose, 39 participants did not receive Nuvaxovid for all three doses. The safety analyses included evaluation of solicited local and systemic adverse reactions within 7 days after a booster dose for participants who completed the electronic diary (n=10,137).
\nThe most frequent solicited adverse reactions were injection site tenderness (73%), injection site pain (61%), fatigue (52%), muscle pain (51.%), headache (45.%), malaise (40%), and joint pain (26.%).
\n\n
Adolescents 12 through 17 years of age
\nThe safety of a booster dose of Nuvaxovid was evaluated in an interim analysis of an ongoing Phase 3 study (Study 2019nCoV-301). A total of 1,499 participants received a booster dose approximately 9 months after receiving Dose 2 of the primary series. A subset of 220 participants who received the booster dose were evaluated for solicited adverse reactions within 7 days after the booster dose (Ad Hoc Booster Safety Analysis Set), of whom 190 completed the electronic diary.
\nSolicited adverse reactions occurred at higher frequencies and with higher grade in adolescents compared to adults. The most frequent solicited adverse reactions were injection site tenderness (72%), headache (68%), fatigue (66%), injection site pain (64%), muscle pain (62%), malaise (47%), and nausea/vomiting (26%) with a median duration of 1 to 2 days following vaccination. No new safety concerns from the time of the booster dose administration through 28 days after administration were noted among participants.
\n\n
Tabulated list of adverse reactions
\n\n
Adverse reactions observed during clinical studies are listed below according to the following frequency categories:
\nVery common (≥ 1/10),
\nCommon (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10),
\nUncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100),
\nRare (≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000),
\nVery rare (< 1/10,000),
\nNot known (cannot be estimated from the available data).
\n\n
Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in order of decreasing seriousness.
\n\n
Table 1: Adverse reactions from Nuvaxovid clinical trials and post- authorisation experience in individuals 12 years of age and older
| \n MedDRA System Organ Class \n | \n\n Very common \n(≥ 1/10) \n | \n\n Common \n(≥ 1/100 to \n< 1/10) \n | \n\n Uncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to \n< 1/100) \n | \n\n Rare \n(≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000) \n | \n\n Not known (cannot be estimated from the available data) \n | \n
| \n Blood and lymphatic system disorders \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n Lymphadenopathy \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n
| \n Immune system disorders \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n Anaphylaxis \n | \n
| \n Nervous system disorders \n | \n\n Headache \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n Paraesthesia \nHypoaesthesia \n | \n
| \n Cardiac \ndisorders \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n Myocarditis \nPericarditis \n | \n
| \n Vascular disorders \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n Hypertensiond \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n
| \n Gastrointestinal disorders \n | \n\n Nausea or vomitinga \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n
| \n Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n Rash \nErythema \nPruritus \nUrticaria \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n
| \n Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders \n | \n\n Myalgiaa \nArthralgiaa \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n \n | \n
| \n General disorders and administration site conditions \n | \n\n Injection site tendernessa \nInjection site paina \nFatiguea \nMalaisea,b \n | \n\n Injection site rednessa,c \nInjection site swellinga \nPyrexiae \nPain in extremity \n | \n\n Injection site pruritus \nChills \n\n | \n\n Injection site warmth \n\n | \n\n \n | \n
a Higher frequencies of these events were observed after the second dose.
\nb This term also included events reported as influenza-like illness.
\nc This term includes both injection site redness and injection site erythema (common).
\nd Hypertension was not reported in adolescents aged 12 through 17 years in the clinical study.
\ne Pyrexia was observed more frequently in adolescents aged 12 through 17 years compared to adults, with the frequency being very common after the second dose in adolescents.
\n\n
Description of selected adverse reactions
\n\n
Throughout the clinical trials, an increased incidence of hypertension following vaccination with Nuvaxovid (n=46, 1.0%) as compared to placebo (n=22, 0.6%) was observed in older adults during the 3 days following vaccination.
\n
\n
Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the national reporting system listed in Appendix V and include batch/Lot number if available.
\n
No case of overdose has been reported. In the event of an overdose, monitoring of vital functions and possible symptomatic treatment is recommended.
\n
\n
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Vaccine, protein subunit, ATC code: J07BN04
\n\n
Mechanism of action
\n\n
Nuvaxovid is composed of purified full-length SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike (S) protein that is stabilised in its prefusion conformation. The addition of the saponin-based Matrix-M adjuvant facilitates activation of the cells of the innate immune system, which enhances the magnitude of the S protein-specific immune response. The two vaccine components elicit B- and T-cell immune responses to the S protein, including neutralising antibodies, which may contribute to protection against COVID-19.
\n\n
Clinical efficacy
\n\n
Primary series
\n\n
The clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of Nuvaxovid is being evaluated in two pivotal, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 studies, Study 1 (2019nCoV-301) conducted in North America and Study 2 (2019nCoV-302) conducted in the United Kingdom, and a Phase 2a/b study, Study 3, conducted in South Africa.
\n\n
Study 1 (2019nCoV-301)
\nStudy 1 is an ongoing Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study with an adult main study conducted in participants 18 years of age and older in the United States and Mexico, and a paediatric expansion occurring in participants 12 through 17 years of age in the United States.
\n\n
Participants 18 years of age and older
\nUpon enrolment in the adult main study, participants were stratified by age (18 to 64 years and ≥ 65 years) and assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive Nuvaxovid or placebo. The study excluded participants who were significantly immunocompromised due to immunodeficiency disease; had active cancer on chemotherapy; received chronic immunosuppressive therapy or received immunoglobulin or blood-derived products within 90 days; were pregnant or breastfeeding; or had a history of laboratory-confirmed diagnosed COVID-19. Participants with clinically stable underlying comorbidity were included as were participants with well-controlled HIV infection.
\n\n
Enrolment of adults completed in February 2021. Participants will be followed for up to 24 months after the second dose for assessments of safety, and efficacy against COVID-19. Following collection of sufficient safety data to support application for emergency use authorisation, initial recipients of placebo were invited to receive two injections of Nuvaxovid 21 days apart and initial recipients of Nuvaxovid to receive two injections of placebo 21 days apart (“blinded crossover”). All participants were offered the opportunity to continue to be followed in the study.
\n\n
The primary efficacy analysis population (referred to as the Per-Protocol Efficacy [PP-EFF] analysis set) included 25,452 participants who received either Nuvaxovid (n = 17,312) or placebo (n = 8,140), received two doses (Dose 1 on day 0; Dose 2 at day 21, median 21 days [IQR 21-23], range 14-60), did not experience an exclusionary protocol deviation, and did not have evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection through 7 days after the second dose.
\n\n
Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced amongst participants who received Nuvaxovid and those who received placebo. In the PP-EFF analysis set for participants who received Nuvaxovid, the median age was 47 years (range: 18 to 95 years); 88% (n = 15,264) were 18 to 64 years old and 12% (n = 2,048) were aged 65 and older; 48% were female; 94% were from the United States and 6% were from Mexico; 76% were White, 11% were Black or African American, 6% were American Indian (including Native Americans) or Alaskan Native, and 4% were Asian; 22% were Hispanic or Latino. At least one pre-existing comorbidity or lifestyle characteristic associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 was present in 16,493 (95%) participants. Comorbidities included: obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2); chronic lung disease; diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease; or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Other high-risk characteristics included age ≥65 years (with or without comorbidities) or age <65 years with comorbidities and/or living or working conditions involving known frequent exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or to densely populated circumstances.
\n\n
COVID-19 cases were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) through a central laboratory. Vaccine efficacy is presented in Table 2.
\n\n
Table 2: Vaccine efficacy against PCR-confirmed COVID-19 with onset from 7 days after second vaccination 1 - PP-EFF analysis set; Study 2019nCoV-301
\n| \n \n \n \n \n Subgroup \n | \n\n Nuvaxovid \n | \n\n Placebo \n | \n\n \n \n % Vaccine Efficacy \n(95% CI) \n | \n||||
| \n \n Partici-pants | \n\n \n COVID-19 cases | \n\n Incidence Rate Per Year Per 1,000 People2 \n | \n\n \n Partici-pants \nN \n | \n\n \n COVID-19 cases n (%)3 \n | \n\n Incidence Rate Per Year Per 1,000 People2 \n | \n||
| \n Primary efficacy endpoint \n | \n|||||||
| \n All participants \n | \n\n 17,312 \n | \n\n 14 (0.1) \n | \n\n 3.26 \n | \n\n 8,140 \n | \n\n 63 (0.8) \n | \n\n 34.01 \n | \n\n 90.4% | \n
1 VE evaluated in participants without major protocol deviations, who are seronegative (for SARS-CoV-2) at baseline and do not have a laboratory confirmed current SARS-CoV-2 infection with symptom onset up to 6 days after the second dose, and who have received the full prescribed regimen of trial vaccine.
\n2 Mean disease incidence rate per year in 1,000 people.
\n3 Based on log-linear model of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection incidence rate using Poisson regression with treatment group and age strata as fixed effects and robust error variance, where VE = 100 × (1 – relative risk) (Zou 2004).
\n4 Met primary efficacy endpoint criterion for success with a lower bound confidence interval (LBCI) > 30%. at the planned primary confirmatory analysis
\n\n
Vaccine efficacy of Nuvaxovid to prevent the onset of COVID-19 from seven days after Dose 2 was 90.4% (95% CI 82.9,94.6). No cases of severe COVID-19 were reported in the 17,312 Nuvaxovid participants compared with 4 cases of severe COVID-19 reported in the 8,140 placebo recipients in the PP-EFF analysis set.
\n\n
Subgroup analyses of the primary efficacy endpoint showed similar efficacy point estimates for male and female participants and racial groups, and across participants with medical comorbidities associated with high risk of severe COVID-19. There were no meaningful differences in overall vaccine efficacy in participants who were at increased risk of severe COVID-19 including those with 1 or more comorbidities that increase the risk of severe COVID-19 (e.g., BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease).
\n\n
Efficacy results reflect enrolment that occurred during the time period when strains classified as
Variants of Concern or Variants of Interest were predominantly circulating in the two countries (US and Mexico) where the study was conducted. Sequencing data were available for 61 of the 77 endpoint cases (79%). Of these, 48 out of 61 (79%) were identified as Variants of Concern or Variants of Interest. The most common Variants of Concern identified were Alpha with 31/61 cases (51%), Beta (2/61, 4%) and Gamma (2/61, 4%), while the most common Variants of Interest were Iota with 8/61 cases (13%), and Epsilon (3/61, 5%).
\n
Efficacy in adolescents 12 through 17 years of age
\nThe assessment of efficacy and immunogenicity of Nuvaxovid in adolescent participants 12 through 17 years of age occurred in the United States in the ongoing paediatric expansion portion of the Phase 3 multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled 2019nCoV-301 study. A total of 1,799 participants, assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive two doses of Nuvaxovid (n=1,205) or placebo (n=594) by intramuscular injection 21 days apart, represented the Per Protocol Efficacy population. Participants with confirmed infection or prior infection due to SARSCoV-2 at the time of randomisation were not included in the primary efficacy analysis.
\n\n
Enrolment of adolescents completed in June 2021. Participants were followed for up to 24 months after the second dose for assessments of safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity against COVID-19. Following a 60-day safety follow-up period, initial adolescent recipients of placebo were invited to receive two injections of Nuvaxovid 21 days apart and initial recipients of Nuvaxovid to receive two injections of placebo 21 days apart (“blinded crossover”). All participants were offered the opportunity to continue to be followed in the study.
\n\n
COVID-19 was defined as first episode of PCR-confirmed mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 with at least one or more of the predefined symptoms within each severity category. Mild COVID-19 was defined as fever, new onset cough or at least 2 or more additional COVID-19 symptoms.
\n\n
There were 20 cases of PCR-confirmed symptomatic mild COVID-19 (Nuvaxovid, n=6 [0.5%]; placebo, n=14 [2.4%]) resulting in a point estimate of efficacy of 79.5% (95% CI: 46.8%, 92.1%).
\n\n
At the time of this analysis, the Delta (B.1.617.2 and AY lineages) variant of concern (VOC) was the predominant variant circulating in the US and accounted for all cases from which sequence data are available (11/20, 55%).
\n\n
Immunogenicity in adolescents 12 through 17 years of age
\nAn analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody response 14 days after Dose 2 (Day 35) was conducted in adolescent participants seronegative to anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein (NP) and PCR-negative at baseline. Neutralising antibody responses were compared with those observed in seronegative/PCR-negative adult participants aged 18 through 25 years from the adult main study (Per Protocol Immunogenicity (PP-IMM) Analysis Set) as shown in Table 3. Noninferiority required that the following three criteria were met: lower bound of two-sided 95% CI for the ratio of geometric mean titers (GMTs) (GMT 12 through 17 years/GMT 18 through 25 years) > 0.67; point estimate of the ratio of GMTs ≥ 0.82; and the lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI for difference of seroconversion rates (SCRs) (SCR 12 through 17 years minus SCR 18 through 25 years) > -10%. These noninferiority criteria were met.
\n\n
Table 3 : Adjusted Ratio of Geometric Mean of Microneutralisation Assay Neutralising Antibody Titers for SARS-CoV-2 S Wild-Type Virus at Day 35 Overall and Presented by Age Group (PP-IMM Analysis Set)1
\n| \n \n Assay \n | \n\n \n \n Timepoint \n | \n\n Paediatric Expansion (12 through 17 Years) \nN=390 \n | \n\n Adult Main Study N=416 \n | \n\n 12 through 17 Years \nversus \n18 through 25 Years \n | \n
| \n \n | \n\n \n | \n\n GMT | \n\n GMT | \n\n GMR | \n
| \n Microneutralisation | \n\n Day 35 (14 days after Dose 2) \n | \n\n 3859.6 | \n\n 2633.6 | \n\n 1.46 | \n
Abbreviations: ANCOVA = analysis of covariance; CI = confidence interval; GMR = ratio of GMT, which is defined as the ratio of 2 GMTs for comparison of 2 age cohorts; GMT = geometric mean titer; LLOQ = lower limit of quantitation; MN = microneutralisation; N = number of participants in assay-specific PP-IMM Analysis Set in each part of study with non-missing response at each visit; PP-IMM = Per-Protocol Immunogenicity; SARS-CoV-2 = severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
\n1 Table includes participants in the active vaccine group only.
\n2 An ANCOVA with age cohort as main effect and baseline MN Assay neutralising antibodies as covariate was performed to estimate the GMR. Individual response values recorded as below the LLOQ were set to half LLOQ.
\n3 Represents (n1, n2) populations defined as:
n1 = number of participants in adult main study (18 through 25 years) with non-missing neutralising antibodies result
n2 = number of participants in paediatric expansion (12 through 17 years) with non-missing neutralising antibodies result
\n
Study 2 (2019nCoV-302)
\nStudy 2 was a Phase 3, multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study in participants 18 to 84 years of age in the United Kingdom. Upon enrolment, participants were stratified by age (18 to 64 years; 65 to 84 years) to receive Nuvaxovid or placebo. The study excluded participants who were significantly immunocompromised due to immunodeficiency disease; current diagnosis or treatment for cancer; autoimmune disease/condition; received chronic immunosuppressive therapy or received immunoglobulin or blood-derived products within 90 days; bleeding disorder or continuous use of anticoagulants; history of allergic reactions and/or anaphylaxis; were pregnant; or had a history of laboratory-confirmed diagnosed COVID-19. Participants with clinically stable disease, defined as disease not requiring significant change in therapy or hospitalisation for worsening disease during the 4 weeks before enrolment were included. Participants with known stable infection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis B virus (HBV) were not excluded from enrolment.
\n\n
Enrolment was completed in November 2020. Participants were followed for up to 12 months after the primary vaccination series for assessments of safety and efficacy against COVID-19.
\n\n
The primary efficacy analysis set (PP-EFF) included 14,039 participants who received either Nuvaxovid (n=7,020) or placebo (n=7,019), received two doses (Dose 1 on day 0; Dose 2 at median 21 days (IQR 21-23), range 16-45, did not experience an exclusionary protocol deviation, and did not have evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection through 7 days after the second dose.
\n\n
Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced amongst participants who received Nuvaxovid and participants who received placebo. In the PP-EFF analysis set for participants who received Nuvaxovid, median age was 56.0 years (range: 18 to 84 years); 72% (n=5,067) were 18 to 64 years old and 28% (n=1,953) were aged 65 to 84; 49% were female; 94% were White; 3% were Asian; 1% were multiple races, <1% were Black or African American; and <1% were Hispanic or Latino; and 45% had at least one comorbid condition.
\n\n
Table 4: Vaccine efficacy analysis of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second vaccination - (PP-EFF population): Study 2 (2019nCoV-302)
\n| \n \n \n \n \n Subgroup \n | \n\n Nuvaxovid \n | \n\n Placebo \n | \n\n \n \n % Vaccine Efficacy \n(95% CI) \n | \n||||
| \n \n Partici-pants | \n\n \n COVID-19 cases | \n\n Incidence Rate Per Year Per 1,000 People1 \n | \n\n \n Partici-pants | \n\n \n COVID-19 cases | \n\n Incidence Rate Per Year Per 1,000 People1 \n | \n||
| \n Primary efficacy endpoint \n | \n|||||||
| \n All participants \n | \n\n 7,020 \n | \n\n 10 (0.1) \n | \n\n 6.53 \n | \n\n 7,019 \n | \n\n 96 (1.4) \n | \n\n 63.43 \n | \n\n 89.7% | \n
| \n Subgroup analyses of the primary efficacy endpoint \n | \n|||||||
| \n 18 to 64 years of age \n | \n\n 5,067 \n | \n\n 9 (0.2) \n | \n\n 12.30 \n | \n\n 5,062 \n | \n\n 87 (1.7) \n | \n\n 120.22 \n | \n\n 89.8% | \n
| \n 65 to 84 years of age \n | \n\n 1,953 \n | \n\n 1 (0.10)2 \n | \n\n --- \n | \n\n 1,957 \n | \n\n 9 (0.9)2 \n | \n\n --- \n | \n\n 88.9% | \n
1 Mean disease incidence rate per year in 1000 people.
\n2 Based on Log-linear model of occurrence using modified Poisson regression with logarithmic link function, treatment group and strata (age-group and pooled region) as fixed effects and robust error variance [Zou 2004].
\n3 Met primary efficacy endpoint criterion for success with a lower bound confidence interval (LBCI) > 30%, efficacy has been confirmed at the interim analysis.
\n4 Based on the Clopper-Pearson model (due to few events), 95% CIs calculated using the Clopper-Pearson exact binomial method adjusted for the total surveillance time.
\n\n
These results reflect enrolment that occurred during the time period when the B.1.1.7 (Alpha) variant was circulating in the UK. Identification of the Alpha variant was based on S gene target failure by PCR. Data were available for 95 of the 106 endpoint cases (90%). Of these, 66 out of 95 (69%) were identified as the Alpha variant with the other cases classified as non-Alpha.
\n\n
No cases of severe COVID-19 were reported in the 7,020 Nuvaxovid participants compared with 4 cases of severe COVID-19 reported in the 7,019 placebo recipients in the PP-EFF analysis set.
\n\n
Licensed seasonal influenza vaccine co-administration sub-study
\nOverall, 431 participants were co-vaccinated with inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines; 217 sub-study participants received Nuvaxovid and 214 received placebo. Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced amongst participants who received Nuvaxovid and participants who received placebo. In the per-protocol immunogenicity (PP-IMM) analysis set for participants who received Nuvaxovid (n=191), median age was 40 years (range: 22 to 70 years); 93% (n=178) were 18 to 64 years old and 7% (n=13) were aged 65 to 84; 43% were female; 75% were White; 23% were multiracial or from ethnic minorities; and 27% had at least one comorbid condition. Co-administration resulted in no change to influenza vaccine immune responses as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assay. A 30% reduction in antibody responses to Nuvaxovid was noted as assessed by an anti-spike IgG assay with seroconversion rates similar to participants who did not receive concomitant influenza vaccine (see section 4.5 and section 4.8).
\n\n
Study 3 (2019nCoV-501)
\nStudy 3 was a Phase 2a/b, multicentre, randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study in HIV-negative participants 18 to 84 years of age and people living with HIV (PLWH) 18 to 64 years of age in South Africa. PLWH were medically stable (free of opportunistic infections), receiving highly active and stable antiretroviral therapy, and having an HIV-1 viral load of < 1000 copies/mL.
\n\n
Enrolment was completed in November 2020.
\n\n
The primary efficacy analysis set (PP-EFF) included 2,770 participants who received either Nuvaxovid (n=1,408) or placebo (n=1,362), received two doses (Dose 1 on day 0; Dose 2 on day 21), did not experience an exclusionary protocol deviation, and did not have evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection through 7 days after the second dose.
\n\n
Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced amongst participants who received Nuvaxovid and participants who received placebo. In the PP-EFF analysis set for participants who received Nuvaxovid, median age was 28 years (range: 18 to 84 years); 40% were female; 91% were Black/African American; 2% were White; 3% were multiple races, 1% were Asian; and 2% were Hispanic or Latino; and 5.5% were HIV-positive.
\n\n
A total of 147 symptomatic mild, moderate, or severe COVID-19 cases among all adult participants, seronegative (to SARS-CoV-2) at baseline, were accrued for the complete analysis (PP-EFF Analysis Set) of the primary efficacy endpoint, with 51 (3.62%) cases for Nuvaxovid versus 96 (7.05%) cases for placebo. The resultant vaccine efficacy of Nuvaxovid was 48.6% (95% CI: 28.4, 63.1).
\n\n
These results reflect enrolment that occurred during the time period when the B.1.351 (Beta) variant was circulating in South Africa.
\n\n
Booster dose
\n\n
Immunogenicity in participants 18 years of age and older
\nStudy 2019nCoV-101, Part 2
\nThe safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of Nuvaxovid was evaluated in an ongoing Phase 2 randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical study administered as a single booster dose (Study 2019nCoV-101, Part 2) in healthy adult participants aged 18 to 84 years of age who were seronegative to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. A total of 254 participants (Full Analysis Set) received two doses of Nuvaxovid (0.5 mL, 5 micrograms 3 weeks apart) as the primary vaccination series. A subset of 104 participants received a booster dose of Nuvaxovid approximately 6 months after receiving Dose 2 of the primary series. A single booster dose of Nuvaxovid induced an. approximate 96-fold increase in neutralising antibodies from a GMT of 63 pre-booster (Day 189) to a GMT of 6,023 post-booster (Day 217) and an approximate 4.1-fold increase from a peak GMT (14 days post-Dose 2) of 1,470.
\n\n
Study 2019nCoV-501
\nIn Study 3, a Phase 2a/b randomised, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled study, the safety and immunogenicity of booster dose was evaluated in healthy HIV-negative adult participants 18 to 84 years of age and medically stable PLWH 18 to 64 years of age who were seronegative to SARS-CoV-2 at baseline. A total of 1,173 participants (PP-IMM Analysis Set) received a booster dose of Nuvaxovid approximately 6 months after completion of the primary series of Nuvaxovid (Day 201). An approximate 52-fold increase in neutralising antibodies was shown from a GMT of 69 pre-booster (Day 201) to a GMT of 3,600 post-booster (Day 236) and an approximate 5.2-fold increase from a peak GMT (14 days post-Dose 2) of 694.
\n\n
Safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines given as booster doses following completion of a primary vaccination series with another authorised COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated in an independent study in the UK.
\n\n
The independent, multicentre, randomised, controlled, Phase 2 investigator-initiated trial (CoV-BOOST, EudraCT 2021-002175-19) investigated the immunogenicity of a booster in adults aged 30 years and older with no history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nuvaxovid was administered at least 70 days after completion of a ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca) primary vaccination series or at least 84 days after completion of a BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) primary vaccination series. Neutralising antibody titers measured by a wild-type assay were assessed 28 days post-booster dose. Within the group assigned to receive Nuvaxovid, 115 participants received a two-dose primary series of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 and 114 participants received a two-dose primary series of BNT162b2, prior to receiving a single booster dose (0.5 mL) of Nuvaxovid. Nuvaxovid demonstrated a booster response regardless of the vaccine used for primary vaccination.
\n\n
Booster dose in Adolescents 12 through 17 years of age
\nThe effectiveness of booster doses of Nuvaxovid in adolescents 12 through 17 years of age is inferred from data gathered for booster doses of the vaccine in adults in studies 2019nCoV-101 and 2019nCoV-501, as Nuvaxovid has been shown to induce a comparable immune response and effectiveness after the primary series in adolescents as in adults, and the ability to boost the vaccine-induced immune response was shown in adults.
\n\n
Elderly population
\n\n
Nuvaxovid was assessed in individuals 18 years of age and older. The efficacy of Nuvaxovid was consistent between elderly (≥ 65 years) and younger individuals (18 to 64 years) for the primary series.
\n\n
Paediatric population
\n\n
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with Nuvaxovid in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in prevention of COVID-19, see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use.
\n
\n
Not applicable.
\n
\n
Non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of repeat-dose toxicity, local tolerance and reproductive and developmental toxicity.
\n\n
Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity
\n\n
In vitro genotoxicity studies were conducted with the Matrix-M adjuvant. The adjuvant was shown to be non-genotoxic. Carcinogenicity studies were not performed. Carcinogenicity is not expected.
\n\n
Reproductive toxicity
\n\n
A developmental and reproductive toxicity study was performed in female rats administered four intramuscular doses (two prior to mating; two during gestation) of 5 micrograms SARS-CoV-2 rS protein (approximately 200-fold excess relative to the human dose of 5 micrograms on a weight-adjusted basis) with 10 micrograms Matrix-M adjuvant (approximately 40-fold excess relative to the human dose of 50 micrograms on a weight-adjusted basis). No vaccine-related adverse effects on fertility, pregnancy/lactation, or development of the embryo/foetus and offspring through post-natal Day 21 were observed.
\n\n
\n
Disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate
\nSodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate
\nSodium chloride
\nPolysorbate 80
\nSodium hydroxide (for adjustment of pH)
\nHydrochloric acid (for adjustment of pH)
\nWater for injections
\n\n
Adjuvant (Matrix-M)
\nCholesterol
\nPhosphatidylcholine (including all-rac-α-Tocopherol)
\nPotassium dihydrogen phosphate
\nPotassium chloride
\nDisodium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate
\nSodium chloride
\nWater for injections
\n\n
For adjuvant: see also section 2.
\n
\n
This medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products or diluted.
\n
\n
Unopened vial
\n\n
12 months at 2°C to 8°C, protected from light.
\n\n
Unopened Nuvaxovid vaccine has been shown to be stable up to 12 hours at 25°C. Storage at 25°C is not the recommended storage or shipping condition but may guide decisions for use in case of temporary temperature excursions during the 12-month storage at 2°C to 8°C.
\n\n
Punctured vial
\n\n
Chemical and physical in-use stability has been demonstrated for 12 hours at 2°C to 8°C or 6 hours at room temperature (maximum 25°C) from the time of first needle puncture to administration.
\n\n
From a microbiological point of view, after first opening (first needle puncture), the vaccine should be used immediately. If not used immediately, in-use storage times and conditions are the responsibility of the user and should not exceed 12 hours at 2°C to 8°C or 6 hours at room temperature (maximum 25°C).
\n
\n
Store in a refrigerator (2°C – 8°C).
\nDo not freeze.
\n\n
Keep the vials in the outer carton in order to protect from light.
\n\n
For storage conditions after first opening of the medicinal product, see section 6.3.
\n
\n
Multidose vial
\n\n
5-dose vial
\n2.5 mL of dispersion in a vial (type I glass) with a stopper (bromobutyl rubber) and an aluminium overseal with blue plastic flip-off cap.
\n\n
Each vial contains 5 doses of 0.5 mL.
\n\n
Pack size: 2 multidose vials or 10 multidose vials
\n\n
10-dose vial
\n5 mL of dispersion in a vial (type I glass) with a stopper (bromobutyl rubber) and an aluminium overseal with blue plastic flip-off cap.
\n\n
Each vial contains 10 doses of 0.5 mL.
\n\n
Pack size: 2 multidose vials or 10 multidose vials
\n\n
Not all pack sizes may be marketed.
\n\n
\n
Handling instructions and administration
\n\n
This vaccine should be handled by a healthcare professional using aseptic techniques to ensure the sterility of each dose.
\n\n
Preparation for use
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
Inspect the vial
\n\n
\n
\n
Administer the vaccine
\n\n
\n
\n
\n
Storage after first needle puncture
\n\n
Discard
\n\n
Disposal
\n\n
\n
Novavax CZ a.s.
\nLíbalova 2348/1, Chodov
\n149 00 Praha 4
\nCzechia
\n\n
\n
EU/1/21/1618/001 10 multidose vials (10 doses per vial)
\nEU/1/21/1618/002 10 multidose vials (5 doses per vial)
\nEU/1/21/1618/003 2 multidose vials (10 doses per vial)
\nEU/1/21/1618/004 2 multidose vials (5 doses per vial)
\n\n
\n
Date of first authorisation: 20 December 2021
\nDate of latest renewal: 03 October 2022
\n
\n
Detailed information on this medicinal product is available on the website of the European Medicines Agency http://www.ema.europa.eu.
\n